Working through foundational research methodologies this week brought key insights into academic writing approaches for our critical report development. The session deconstructed effective research strategies, emphasizing how initial research questions fundamentally shape topic exploration. The lecture engaged deeply with source evaluation methodology.
A practical exploration of animation history revealed interesting applications of meta-narrative techniques. Early animation frequently incorporated the artist’s presence, creating a dialogue between creator and creation that continues to influence contemporary work. This analysis ties into my current research examining the theoretical frameworks in Wells’ “Understanding Animation,” particularly regarding how abstract and orthodox animation approaches differ in their handling of narrative construction.
The practical part had us hunting for examples where animators showed up in their own work. I watched this fascinating piece called Fantasmagorie from 1908 where the animator’s hand actually appears, drawing the first character right there on screen.
Looking at animation techniques between orthodox and abstract approaches, I aim to examine how they differ both technically and narratively. I plan to examine multiple examples, and taking them apart to understand their fundamental differences. This analysis will build a stronger foundation for my critical report.
