
Today’s lecture involved Paul Wells views on animation narrative. What really hit home for me was the understanding that the animation writer must go beyond conventional storytelling restraints while remaining grounded in fundamental narrative principles. What mostly intrigues me in Well’s claim is how it dares us as creators. To him, while animation does carry some of the DNA of live-action filmmaking, its true strength lies in its unique vocabulary. This really resonates with my work currently on the Burlap Friends project, where I have been working to tell complex emotional stories with inanimate objects.

Wells’ insistence that animation writers must be “writers all the time” always observing and changing life around him into material, had me reflecting on my own writing process. For instance, with the recent character developments, I have been treating my plush toy characters as conventional horror antagonists instead of taking advantage of the animation medium to push for a more unique angle. What’s particularly enlightening about Wells’ perspective is the emphasis he places on animation making the absurd plausible; it is not a feast of visuals merely, but to find new ways of reaching your audience with impossible situations made plausible.
In my own work, this has prompted me to reconsider how I approach scene transitions and character movements, looking for opportunities to bend reality in ways that serve the story rather than just adhering to physical laws. But what this lecture has really been able to force me to consider is how I utilise animation’s unique properties to enhance narrative rather than just serve it. Moving forward, I aim to be more bold with form and movement in my storytelling, while keeping Wells’ emphasis on maintaining narrative coherence firmly in mind.